http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/06/cardinal-pell-and-the-vaticans-day-of-reckoning.html
Cardinal George Pellophile was sentenced to 6 years for RAPE of Children.
https://www.theage.com.au
The Fallible Cardinals
I’ve noticed an interesting new trend lately, once seen to be infallible, the Catholic Church Princes were like exotic butterflies. Once considered a miracle of transformation and resurrection, the ominous Cardinals of the behemoth, Roman Catholic Church. The Vatican will devour itself soon enough, imploded bright crimson robed Priests were always associated with power, authority, anomalous sexuality, mystery, sophistication, elegance, anger, fear, evil, sadness, death, mourning, remorse and death, and all things of the occult. Whereas a strange old myth describes how Roman Catholic Cardinals, camouflage themselves to devour souls during a solar eclipse. According to some superstitions, these dainty drag creatures, fully dressed Cardinals have quite a touch of evil about them.
Senior ecclesiastical leaders, always considered as untouchable Princes of the Roman Catholic Church, have now been convicted of raping and covering up the rape of millions of children world-wide. The news this day- a French Court this Morning, the 7th. of March 2019 at 9 a.m. has convicted the Catholic Archbishop of Lyon of failing to act on historic allegations of Sexual Rape of Boy Scouts in his diocese. The French Judges handed Cardinal Philippe Barbarin a six-month suspended jail sentence. Oh mighty Princes of the church, the promised throne of Peter, descends, pierced by the burning bolts, of old they fell, and still roll bellowing in the depths of Hell.
A few months ago, another Cardinal, “Vanilla Sex” Pell (Pellophile) was convicted in a court of law of raping two choir boys in a Catholic Cathedral in Australia. One of the boy’s subsequently committed suicide soon after his rape. With many more credible accusations by other men who as young children were raped and sexual assaulted by Vanilla Sex” Pell when he was a young Priest. But Cardinal Vanilla Sex” Pell, biggest crime was as a Catholic Church Canon Lawyer, defending hundreds of pedophile Priests in Australia. While his pedophile Clerics committed hundreds more rapes of vulnerable children throughout Australia, with the full blessing of the Roman Catholic Church and Cardinal Pellophile. The Vatican rewarded Vanilla Sex Pell” works by making him a Cardinal.
Then we had the ignominious end of Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston, a true friend of pedophile Priests, who also activity covered up thousands of rapes of children by his pedophile Priests. The messy and hectic consequences brought about by previously secret rapes of children by Catholic Priests in Boston becoming public knowledge, and exposed by the Boston Globe. Cardinal Bernard Law than ran to hid out in the Vatican, which shield Cardinal Law from potential criminal prosecution as his new position conveyed citizenship in the Vatican City. Law's name became emblematic of the sex scandals that continues to trouble the American Catholic Church and its followers after a Boston Globe investigation (Spotlight) revealed that he and other Bishops pursued an active covered up of child rape of thousands of children by his Priests in the Boston Archdiocese.
Another Cardinal, Roger Mahony of Los Angeles who also covered up thousands of rapes of children by his pedophile Priests in Los Angeles. Cardinal Mahony knowingly harboured, concealed and aided many sexual criminals acts by his Clerics. Cardinal Mahony knew of their sexual crimes and rapes against innocent children. Cardinal Mahony knew that vulnerable children were been raped and instead of calling the L.A. Police, Cardinal Mahony manipulated the information, frightened the children and their parents into silence, and moved these pedophile Priests, unabated from parish to parish thus allowing the rape of hundreds of innocent children to continue. Cardinal Mahony crime was that he directly aided and abetted pedophile Priests in L.A. to hide and leave the city of Los Angeles to avoid criminal prosecution. Cardinal, Roger Mahony of Los Angeles said- “that we all have to have mercy and 'forgive' ... I say he is just evil."
More still, the defrock Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, of Washington, who raped his own nephew and who actively covered-up the rapes of thousands of children. Irish-born Cardinal Kevin Farrell, former Archbishop of Dallas, who covered up for defrocked Cardinal McCarrick gets promotion, into a cushy post in the Vatican, keeping it in the family. Cardinal McCarrick has said -
he had "absolutely no recollection" of the alleged rape of children but has not commented on the allegations of the rape of young men, training as Priests.
Cardinal Farrell’s reward, was an appointment to one of the most vital offices in the Vatican. The three wise monkeys of the Vatican are embodying the proverbial principle of "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” The three monkeys is in reality, the Pope, as a mystic ape, covering his eyes, who sees no evil, covering his ears, who hears no evil, covering his mouth, who speaks no evil. In the Roman Catholic Church world both the proverb and the image are used to refer to a lack of moral responsibility on the part of people who refuse to acknowledge impropriety, looking the other way, or feigning ignorance. It also signifies a code of silence in the Roman Catholic Church.
It also means 'Don't listen to the truth because it will disturb all your consoling lies'. 'Don't look at the truth; otherwise your God will be dead and your heaven and hell will disappear’ and don't speak the truth, otherwise you will be condemned, crucified, poisoned, tortured by the whole crowd, the unconscious people. The Catholic Church’s secret among the Clerics is "Keep your pleasures, your joys, hidden. Don't let anybody know that you are a pedophile, a blissful rapist, an ecstatic man, because that will destroy your very life. The Vatican says secretly to its clerics-“it is dangerous to tell the truth about our misdeeds and more so to tell the truth of the rape of millions of children.
Then we have the fall of Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington who also knew and coved up the rape of children by both his Priests and Cardinals. When asked, Cardinal Donald Wuerl said-
“I forgot I knew about the sexual rape of children and a Cardinal who did know, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick.”
Cardinal Donald Wuerl also called it a "lapse of memory” how very convenient. The Report of the Pennsylvania Grand Jury, published on August 14th-2018, found “wholesale institutional failure that endangered the welfare of thousands of children” in Pittsburgh. It faulted Cardinal Wuerl for what it said was his active role in the concealment of Sexual Rape of thousands of children. The Report of the Pennsylvania Grand Jury, chose three examples from cases involving 99 Pedophile Priests there as -
“a window into the conduct” of Bishops “and the crimes they permitted to occur on their watch”.
I could go on but I would never finish, when will society wake up to the reality of The Cult masquerading as a force of good, when as can be seen it is all but a dangerous Cult. The Vatican is a true home, a safe haven for all manners of pedophiles, psychopaths, deranged lunatics, psychotic sociopaths. Religious revelations and psychotic hallucinations are sometimes confusingly similar. Many Priests of The Cult with psychotic issues say that they see visions and hear voices. The Clerics experience hallucinations as so real that they are unable to distinguish between fantasy and reality. Many Clerics claim a personal relationship with Jesus, some Clerics claim to see the Virgin Mary, or Holy Angles.
The traits of The Cult-The Catholic Church are pathological lying, plus-
I personally think that all members of The Cult known as the Roman Catholic Church are psychotic rapists and the definition of Psychotic Disorders are severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions. Clerics with psychoses lose touch with reality. Two of the main symptoms are delusions and hallucinations. Schizophrenia is one type of psychotic disorder. Two of the main symptoms are delusions and hallucinations. Delusions are false beliefs, speaking to imaginary religious figures and Hallucinations are false perceptions, such as hearing, seeing, or feeling something that is not there. The Institutionalised rapists psychotics of The Cult have taken over the lunatic asylum known formally as the Vatican, the problem is, what are we as a society, the people or the congregation going to do about it.? I say shut it down immediately and millions more children will be safe and bring to a swift end the madness of psychotic Clerics continuing to rape future generations of children. Owen Felix O’Neill
I’ve noticed an interesting new trend lately, once seen to be infallible, the Catholic Church Princes were like exotic butterflies. Once considered a miracle of transformation and resurrection, the ominous Cardinals of the behemoth, Roman Catholic Church. The Vatican will devour itself soon enough, imploded bright crimson robed Priests were always associated with power, authority, anomalous sexuality, mystery, sophistication, elegance, anger, fear, evil, sadness, death, mourning, remorse and death, and all things of the occult. Whereas a strange old myth describes how Roman Catholic Cardinals, camouflage themselves to devour souls during a solar eclipse. According to some superstitions, these dainty drag creatures, fully dressed Cardinals have quite a touch of evil about them.
Senior ecclesiastical leaders, always considered as untouchable Princes of the Roman Catholic Church, have now been convicted of raping and covering up the rape of millions of children world-wide. The news this day- a French Court this Morning, the 7th. of March 2019 at 9 a.m. has convicted the Catholic Archbishop of Lyon of failing to act on historic allegations of Sexual Rape of Boy Scouts in his diocese. The French Judges handed Cardinal Philippe Barbarin a six-month suspended jail sentence. Oh mighty Princes of the church, the promised throne of Peter, descends, pierced by the burning bolts, of old they fell, and still roll bellowing in the depths of Hell.
A few months ago, another Cardinal, “Vanilla Sex” Pell (Pellophile) was convicted in a court of law of raping two choir boys in a Catholic Cathedral in Australia. One of the boy’s subsequently committed suicide soon after his rape. With many more credible accusations by other men who as young children were raped and sexual assaulted by Vanilla Sex” Pell when he was a young Priest. But Cardinal Vanilla Sex” Pell, biggest crime was as a Catholic Church Canon Lawyer, defending hundreds of pedophile Priests in Australia. While his pedophile Clerics committed hundreds more rapes of vulnerable children throughout Australia, with the full blessing of the Roman Catholic Church and Cardinal Pellophile. The Vatican rewarded Vanilla Sex Pell” works by making him a Cardinal.
Then we had the ignominious end of Cardinal Bernard Law of Boston, a true friend of pedophile Priests, who also activity covered up thousands of rapes of children by his pedophile Priests. The messy and hectic consequences brought about by previously secret rapes of children by Catholic Priests in Boston becoming public knowledge, and exposed by the Boston Globe. Cardinal Bernard Law than ran to hid out in the Vatican, which shield Cardinal Law from potential criminal prosecution as his new position conveyed citizenship in the Vatican City. Law's name became emblematic of the sex scandals that continues to trouble the American Catholic Church and its followers after a Boston Globe investigation (Spotlight) revealed that he and other Bishops pursued an active covered up of child rape of thousands of children by his Priests in the Boston Archdiocese.
Another Cardinal, Roger Mahony of Los Angeles who also covered up thousands of rapes of children by his pedophile Priests in Los Angeles. Cardinal Mahony knowingly harboured, concealed and aided many sexual criminals acts by his Clerics. Cardinal Mahony knew of their sexual crimes and rapes against innocent children. Cardinal Mahony knew that vulnerable children were been raped and instead of calling the L.A. Police, Cardinal Mahony manipulated the information, frightened the children and their parents into silence, and moved these pedophile Priests, unabated from parish to parish thus allowing the rape of hundreds of innocent children to continue. Cardinal Mahony crime was that he directly aided and abetted pedophile Priests in L.A. to hide and leave the city of Los Angeles to avoid criminal prosecution. Cardinal, Roger Mahony of Los Angeles said- “that we all have to have mercy and 'forgive' ... I say he is just evil."
More still, the defrock Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, of Washington, who raped his own nephew and who actively covered-up the rapes of thousands of children. Irish-born Cardinal Kevin Farrell, former Archbishop of Dallas, who covered up for defrocked Cardinal McCarrick gets promotion, into a cushy post in the Vatican, keeping it in the family. Cardinal McCarrick has said -
he had "absolutely no recollection" of the alleged rape of children but has not commented on the allegations of the rape of young men, training as Priests.
Cardinal Farrell’s reward, was an appointment to one of the most vital offices in the Vatican. The three wise monkeys of the Vatican are embodying the proverbial principle of "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” The three monkeys is in reality, the Pope, as a mystic ape, covering his eyes, who sees no evil, covering his ears, who hears no evil, covering his mouth, who speaks no evil. In the Roman Catholic Church world both the proverb and the image are used to refer to a lack of moral responsibility on the part of people who refuse to acknowledge impropriety, looking the other way, or feigning ignorance. It also signifies a code of silence in the Roman Catholic Church.
It also means 'Don't listen to the truth because it will disturb all your consoling lies'. 'Don't look at the truth; otherwise your God will be dead and your heaven and hell will disappear’ and don't speak the truth, otherwise you will be condemned, crucified, poisoned, tortured by the whole crowd, the unconscious people. The Catholic Church’s secret among the Clerics is "Keep your pleasures, your joys, hidden. Don't let anybody know that you are a pedophile, a blissful rapist, an ecstatic man, because that will destroy your very life. The Vatican says secretly to its clerics-“it is dangerous to tell the truth about our misdeeds and more so to tell the truth of the rape of millions of children.
Then we have the fall of Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington who also knew and coved up the rape of children by both his Priests and Cardinals. When asked, Cardinal Donald Wuerl said-
“I forgot I knew about the sexual rape of children and a Cardinal who did know, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick.”
Cardinal Donald Wuerl also called it a "lapse of memory” how very convenient. The Report of the Pennsylvania Grand Jury, published on August 14th-2018, found “wholesale institutional failure that endangered the welfare of thousands of children” in Pittsburgh. It faulted Cardinal Wuerl for what it said was his active role in the concealment of Sexual Rape of thousands of children. The Report of the Pennsylvania Grand Jury, chose three examples from cases involving 99 Pedophile Priests there as -
“a window into the conduct” of Bishops “and the crimes they permitted to occur on their watch”.
I could go on but I would never finish, when will society wake up to the reality of The Cult masquerading as a force of good, when as can be seen it is all but a dangerous Cult. The Vatican is a true home, a safe haven for all manners of pedophiles, psychopaths, deranged lunatics, psychotic sociopaths. Religious revelations and psychotic hallucinations are sometimes confusingly similar. Many Priests of The Cult with psychotic issues say that they see visions and hear voices. The Clerics experience hallucinations as so real that they are unable to distinguish between fantasy and reality. Many Clerics claim a personal relationship with Jesus, some Clerics claim to see the Virgin Mary, or Holy Angles.
The traits of The Cult-The Catholic Church are pathological lying, plus-
- glib and superficial charm.
- grandiose sense of self.
- need for stimulation.
- cunning and manipulative.
- lack of remorse or guilt.
- shallow emotional response.
- callousness and lack of empathy.
I personally think that all members of The Cult known as the Roman Catholic Church are psychotic rapists and the definition of Psychotic Disorders are severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions. Clerics with psychoses lose touch with reality. Two of the main symptoms are delusions and hallucinations. Schizophrenia is one type of psychotic disorder. Two of the main symptoms are delusions and hallucinations. Delusions are false beliefs, speaking to imaginary religious figures and Hallucinations are false perceptions, such as hearing, seeing, or feeling something that is not there. The Institutionalised rapists psychotics of The Cult have taken over the lunatic asylum known formally as the Vatican, the problem is, what are we as a society, the people or the congregation going to do about it.? I say shut it down immediately and millions more children will be safe and bring to a swift end the madness of psychotic Clerics continuing to rape future generations of children. Owen Felix O’Neill
Breaking News Flash !!!!! 27th. February 2019 --The Pope’s Pedophile?
Cardinal George Pell sent to jail after being convicted of CHILD RAPE.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/cardinal-george-pell-sent-to-jail-after-being-convicted-of-child-abuse-20190227-p510hg.html
Shock and devastation: George Pell guilty verdict rocks Catholic Church
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/george-pell-catholic-guilty-child-sexual-assault-australia-pope-vatican-treasurer-a8796936.html
George Pell: Third most senior Catholic in the world found guilty of child sexual assault;-Vatican treasurer convicted of molesting two choirboys in 1990s
https://www.heraldsun.com.au
Burn in Hell Victims shout as Pellophile leaves Australian Court.
It was the moment the cardinal couldn’t bear to hear any more.
‘‘Oh stop it,’’ George Pell said, wincing and turning his head away.
Cardinal George Pell sent to jail after being convicted of CHILD RAPE.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/cardinal-george-pell-sent-to-jail-after-being-convicted-of-child-abuse-20190227-p510hg.html
Shock and devastation: George Pell guilty verdict rocks Catholic Church
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/george-pell-catholic-guilty-child-sexual-assault-australia-pope-vatican-treasurer-a8796936.html
George Pell: Third most senior Catholic in the world found guilty of child sexual assault;-Vatican treasurer convicted of molesting two choirboys in 1990s
https://www.heraldsun.com.au
Burn in Hell Victims shout as Pellophile leaves Australian Court.
It was the moment the cardinal couldn’t bear to hear any more.
‘‘Oh stop it,’’ George Pell said, wincing and turning his head away.
I don't mind anybody, or other Websites or Newspapers using my research, all I ask, is that you acknowledge www.tuambabies.org

Breaking News Flash !!!!! https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/cardinal-theodore-mccarrick-sex-abuse-allegations-catholic-church-a8782221.html
A disgraced former US cardinal has been expelled from the Roman Catholic priesthood over allegations he abused a teenage boy and solicited sex during Confession. The Vatican announced the defrocking of Theodore McCarrick on Saturday days before the Pope leads an extraordinary gathering of bishops from around the world to discuss the sex abuse crisis engulfing the church.
French Cardinal Philippe Barbarin goes on trial today in France accused of helping cover up Rapes of Children, boy Scouts and faces jail if convicted of failing to report Priests who Raped Scouts
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/07/archbishop-of-lyon-cardinal-philippe-barbarin-goes-on-trial-accused-of-helping-cover-up-abuse
Update;-
Cardinal accused of paedophile cover-up says Vatican told him to 'avoid a scandal’
“Cardinal Barbarin is a litigant like everyone else and he must be judged for his actions.” from one of the Boy’s Scouts-François Devaux.
https://www.euronews.com/2019/01/07/trial-for-the-archbishop-of-lyon-begins
AND
The Vatican’s envoy to France is being investigated for sexual assault after he was accused of molesting an official at the Paris mayor’s office during a ceremony last month, a judicial source told AFP.The envoy, 74-year-old Luigi Ventura, has been based in Paris since 2009 and serves as a diplomat for Pope Francis. He was accused of molesting a man at the Paris town hall on January 17 where mayor Anne Hidalgo gave a New Year’s address to diplomats, religious leaders and civil society figures. A complaint was filed by the mayor’s office on January 24 which led to an investigation being opened the day after, the judicial source said. Le Monde newspaper first reported the investigation and the allegations against Ventura on Friday.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/vatican-envoy-france-investigation-sexual-assault/
A disgraced former US cardinal has been expelled from the Roman Catholic priesthood over allegations he abused a teenage boy and solicited sex during Confession. The Vatican announced the defrocking of Theodore McCarrick on Saturday days before the Pope leads an extraordinary gathering of bishops from around the world to discuss the sex abuse crisis engulfing the church.
French Cardinal Philippe Barbarin goes on trial today in France accused of helping cover up Rapes of Children, boy Scouts and faces jail if convicted of failing to report Priests who Raped Scouts
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/07/archbishop-of-lyon-cardinal-philippe-barbarin-goes-on-trial-accused-of-helping-cover-up-abuse
Update;-
Cardinal accused of paedophile cover-up says Vatican told him to 'avoid a scandal’
“Cardinal Barbarin is a litigant like everyone else and he must be judged for his actions.” from one of the Boy’s Scouts-François Devaux.
https://www.euronews.com/2019/01/07/trial-for-the-archbishop-of-lyon-begins
AND
The Vatican’s envoy to France is being investigated for sexual assault after he was accused of molesting an official at the Paris mayor’s office during a ceremony last month, a judicial source told AFP.The envoy, 74-year-old Luigi Ventura, has been based in Paris since 2009 and serves as a diplomat for Pope Francis. He was accused of molesting a man at the Paris town hall on January 17 where mayor Anne Hidalgo gave a New Year’s address to diplomats, religious leaders and civil society figures. A complaint was filed by the mayor’s office on January 24 which led to an investigation being opened the day after, the judicial source said. Le Monde newspaper first reported the investigation and the allegations against Ventura on Friday.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/vatican-envoy-france-investigation-sexual-assault/
Vatican Chief who handled sexual RAPE cases resigns after accusations of sexual abuse
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/vactican-sexual-abuse-catholic-church-hermann-geissler-resigns-allegations-a8753861.html
Catholic archbishop in Brazil bans priests from being alone with children
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/brazil-archbishop-bans-priests-children-manoel-delson-paraiba-state-catholic-church-a8771531.html
New York’s powerful Cardinal Spellman was a Pedophile
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/salon-journalist-reveals-sexual-abuse-victim-hands-new-yorks-powerful-cardinal-spellman/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/brazil-archbishop-bans-priests-children-manoel-delson-paraiba-state-catholic-church-a8771531.html
New York’s powerful Cardinal Spellman was a Pedophile
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/salon-journalist-reveals-sexual-abuse-victim-hands-new-yorks-powerful-cardinal-spellman/
|
|
|
https://web.archive.org/web/20180403051324/http:/brokenrites.org.au/drupal/node/36
|

Cardinal George Pell, Convicted Pellodphile
12/12/'18
A 77 year old man, George Pell an Australian Prelate of the Roman Catholic Church is now a convicted sex offender. An Australian Criminal Court on Tuesday later afternoon has convicted one of the most powerful and highest Vatican official on sexual-rape charges. Cardinal George Pell has been found GUILTY of the rape of two teen boys, after nearly four full days of deliberations, a jury of 12 members rendered unanimous guilty verdicts on all five charges related to the abuse of two choirboys in 1996. Cardinal George Pell’s conviction stemmed from the rape of two teen choir boys in 1996. Only one of the alleged victims was present in court to give evidence against Pell. The other alleged victim, according to a 2017 report from The Australian newspaper The Age, died of a drug overdose in 2014.
When asked how the 12 members of the jury could have delivered a unanimous conviction despite the seeming weight of evidence in Pell’s favour, several trial attendees noted that Cardinal Pell refused to give evidence in his own defence. “Pell didn’t take the stand, and that definitely made a negative impression; it doesn’t look good if you won’t deny it with your own lips.”
This past May, after a four-week committal hearing, an Australian magistrate struck down some of the more serious charges against Pell but ruled he must stand trial on five charges related to sexual abuse of minors. The allegations, however, are from two separate periods, the 1970s and the 1990s, hence Judge Sue Pullen’s decision in May to mandate two different trials.
His case in Criminal High Court in Melbourne, Australia has unfolded in great secrecy because of a court-issued gag order set in place. This criminal conviction provides one of the clearest examples of how the sexual rape scandal has totally eroded the Roman Catholic Church’s credibility while ensnaring senior members in the upper highest echelons of power. Cardinal George Pell is considered the Holy See’s third- most-powerful person, as the Economy Minister in the Vatican. Sadly one of the most important stories in the world has not broken yet, but when it does it will be huge globally. No Irish or English news outlet has covered the story. This will have the power of ripping the filth of the Roman Catholic Church apart. More telling, the Vatican itself has stayed tightlipped on his explosive case, there is a smell of fear emitting from St. Peter's Basilica.
Pope Francis had quietly removed Cardinal Pell from his advisory group known as the Council of Cardinals, along with a Chilean Cardinal, Francisco Javier Errázuriz Ossa, who is accused of covering up for rapist Priests. Another Cardinal from Africa, Congolese Cardinal Laurent Monsengwo Pasinya, was also removed from the Council of Cardinals, but nobody knows why. Pope Francis in dismissing Cardinal Pell and thanked him for his Church services, I assume that also includes his services in the raping of children.
The Australian Court said that Cardinal Pell’s will be sentenced in the New Year, but they will also be bring additional criminal charges very soon. Sadly there is a total news blackout in effect in Australia issued by the trail judge, they wanted a fair trail as best as possible. The judge in the County Court of Victoria had placed the gag order as a way “to prevent a real and substantial risk of prejudice to the proper administration of justice.” Also please remember that Cardinal George Pell is Australia’s most important Catholic Church figure and Australian’s most respected Catholic leader. George Pell was the son of a gold miner who rose to become the Archbishop of both Melbourne and Sydney in Australia.
Cardinal George Pell was meant to help Pope Francis reform the Vatican bureaucracy, that would take some doing. The best way to reform the excrement of the Roman Catholic Church is to totally dismantle the defilement completely. The Australian Justice Department of the Government announced last year that Cardinal Pell must face and answer “ Sexual and Historical Rape Charges”
Cardinal Pell said the accusations were false and made up by the devil, he continued-“The whole idea of sexual rape is abhorrent to me,” Cardinal Pell said. Well the jury of his fellow peers reached a unanimous decision and didn’t believe the Cardinal, the evidence of one of the young boys now brave man stood out as did his suffering and pain. But I say that “Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done.” and a frightened Vatican spokesman said, that the Holy See “has the utmost respect for Australian judicial authorities.” The secrecy surrounding Cardinal Pell’s case reminds me of the Irish Catholic Church’s own approach in dealing with alleged Clerical rapists and pedophiles, always behind closed doors.
This conviction of the one of the highest members of the Roman Catholic Church and a Cardinal to boot, is just the latest in a series of major rape-related developments that have amounted to the greatest challenge of Pope Francis’s Papacy. The fight will go on, in countries around the world, and in more than a dozen States across the United States, and here in Ireland, outside authorities are pursuing crimes within the Catholic Church with unprecedented vigour. The apple never falls far from the tree, Pope Francis himself has been accused by a former Vatican Ambassador of knowing about rapes of children and unwilling to act or respond to the allegations. Than we have the sexual rape of dozens of prepubescent children by another Cardinal, Theodore McCormick, an American prelate of the Catholic Church. He served as Archbishop of Washington and was accused and admitted the rape of his own nephew and other children and students Priest for 40 years.
More insulting is The Vatican is preparing for a landmark Meeting of Pedophiles in the coming New Year to bring hundreds of Bishops- Peodphiles to Rome from across the world to discuss sexual rape and the protection of children, you couldn’t invent this. Please don't let the fox guard the chicken coop and don't set a wolf to watch the sheep. It's really a case of the proverbial fox guarding the chickens. It’s outrageous, The Roman Catholic Church will exploit the meeting for its own ends, the Pope as the Head Shepherd will say, “Thy father guards the sheep’." But in case any Clerics manage to read my Post I will say it in Latin- 'Ovem lupo commitere’. Owen Felix O’Neill
PS. The investigation can be viewed here on a great Australian News site called Broken Rites, click below-
https://web.archive.org/web/20180403051324/http:/brokenrites.org.au/drupal/node/36
12/12/'18
A 77 year old man, George Pell an Australian Prelate of the Roman Catholic Church is now a convicted sex offender. An Australian Criminal Court on Tuesday later afternoon has convicted one of the most powerful and highest Vatican official on sexual-rape charges. Cardinal George Pell has been found GUILTY of the rape of two teen boys, after nearly four full days of deliberations, a jury of 12 members rendered unanimous guilty verdicts on all five charges related to the abuse of two choirboys in 1996. Cardinal George Pell’s conviction stemmed from the rape of two teen choir boys in 1996. Only one of the alleged victims was present in court to give evidence against Pell. The other alleged victim, according to a 2017 report from The Australian newspaper The Age, died of a drug overdose in 2014.
When asked how the 12 members of the jury could have delivered a unanimous conviction despite the seeming weight of evidence in Pell’s favour, several trial attendees noted that Cardinal Pell refused to give evidence in his own defence. “Pell didn’t take the stand, and that definitely made a negative impression; it doesn’t look good if you won’t deny it with your own lips.”
This past May, after a four-week committal hearing, an Australian magistrate struck down some of the more serious charges against Pell but ruled he must stand trial on five charges related to sexual abuse of minors. The allegations, however, are from two separate periods, the 1970s and the 1990s, hence Judge Sue Pullen’s decision in May to mandate two different trials.
His case in Criminal High Court in Melbourne, Australia has unfolded in great secrecy because of a court-issued gag order set in place. This criminal conviction provides one of the clearest examples of how the sexual rape scandal has totally eroded the Roman Catholic Church’s credibility while ensnaring senior members in the upper highest echelons of power. Cardinal George Pell is considered the Holy See’s third- most-powerful person, as the Economy Minister in the Vatican. Sadly one of the most important stories in the world has not broken yet, but when it does it will be huge globally. No Irish or English news outlet has covered the story. This will have the power of ripping the filth of the Roman Catholic Church apart. More telling, the Vatican itself has stayed tightlipped on his explosive case, there is a smell of fear emitting from St. Peter's Basilica.
Pope Francis had quietly removed Cardinal Pell from his advisory group known as the Council of Cardinals, along with a Chilean Cardinal, Francisco Javier Errázuriz Ossa, who is accused of covering up for rapist Priests. Another Cardinal from Africa, Congolese Cardinal Laurent Monsengwo Pasinya, was also removed from the Council of Cardinals, but nobody knows why. Pope Francis in dismissing Cardinal Pell and thanked him for his Church services, I assume that also includes his services in the raping of children.
The Australian Court said that Cardinal Pell’s will be sentenced in the New Year, but they will also be bring additional criminal charges very soon. Sadly there is a total news blackout in effect in Australia issued by the trail judge, they wanted a fair trail as best as possible. The judge in the County Court of Victoria had placed the gag order as a way “to prevent a real and substantial risk of prejudice to the proper administration of justice.” Also please remember that Cardinal George Pell is Australia’s most important Catholic Church figure and Australian’s most respected Catholic leader. George Pell was the son of a gold miner who rose to become the Archbishop of both Melbourne and Sydney in Australia.
Cardinal George Pell was meant to help Pope Francis reform the Vatican bureaucracy, that would take some doing. The best way to reform the excrement of the Roman Catholic Church is to totally dismantle the defilement completely. The Australian Justice Department of the Government announced last year that Cardinal Pell must face and answer “ Sexual and Historical Rape Charges”
Cardinal Pell said the accusations were false and made up by the devil, he continued-“The whole idea of sexual rape is abhorrent to me,” Cardinal Pell said. Well the jury of his fellow peers reached a unanimous decision and didn’t believe the Cardinal, the evidence of one of the young boys now brave man stood out as did his suffering and pain. But I say that “Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done.” and a frightened Vatican spokesman said, that the Holy See “has the utmost respect for Australian judicial authorities.” The secrecy surrounding Cardinal Pell’s case reminds me of the Irish Catholic Church’s own approach in dealing with alleged Clerical rapists and pedophiles, always behind closed doors.
This conviction of the one of the highest members of the Roman Catholic Church and a Cardinal to boot, is just the latest in a series of major rape-related developments that have amounted to the greatest challenge of Pope Francis’s Papacy. The fight will go on, in countries around the world, and in more than a dozen States across the United States, and here in Ireland, outside authorities are pursuing crimes within the Catholic Church with unprecedented vigour. The apple never falls far from the tree, Pope Francis himself has been accused by a former Vatican Ambassador of knowing about rapes of children and unwilling to act or respond to the allegations. Than we have the sexual rape of dozens of prepubescent children by another Cardinal, Theodore McCormick, an American prelate of the Catholic Church. He served as Archbishop of Washington and was accused and admitted the rape of his own nephew and other children and students Priest for 40 years.
More insulting is The Vatican is preparing for a landmark Meeting of Pedophiles in the coming New Year to bring hundreds of Bishops- Peodphiles to Rome from across the world to discuss sexual rape and the protection of children, you couldn’t invent this. Please don't let the fox guard the chicken coop and don't set a wolf to watch the sheep. It's really a case of the proverbial fox guarding the chickens. It’s outrageous, The Roman Catholic Church will exploit the meeting for its own ends, the Pope as the Head Shepherd will say, “Thy father guards the sheep’." But in case any Clerics manage to read my Post I will say it in Latin- 'Ovem lupo commitere’. Owen Felix O’Neill
PS. The investigation can be viewed here on a great Australian News site called Broken Rites, click below-
https://web.archive.org/web/20180403051324/http:/brokenrites.org.au/drupal/node/36
A Catholic Church Report contains allegations about George Pell Raping an altar boy in 1961-62
Australia's Catholic Church hierarchy received a complaint in 2002 that a trainee priest (George Pell) had sexually abused a twelve-year-old altar boy (named Phil) in 1961-1962 at a holiday camp for boys on Phillip Island, south-east of Melbourne. According to a church document, Phil has alleged that, on several occasions, the trainee priest George Pell (then about 20) thrust his hand down the inside of Phil's pants and got "a good handful" of the boy's penis and testicles; and, on other occasions, George Pell allegedly tried to guide the boy's hand into the front of Pell's pants. By the year 2000, when Phil was aged 50, he realised that the trainee priest George Pell had risen to become an Archbishop. Phil was shocked — "he did not think it right that someone who had behaved indecently towards children should lead the church," the church document says. So, beginning in 2000, Phil tried to alert the church authorities. Phil emphasised that he was notseeking compensation. And he was not reporting this matter to the police (therefore there is nopolice investigation into Phil's complaint). Rather, Phil was concerned about the safety of children in the church's care; and he merely wanted the church authorities to be aware of the offences that were allegedly committed upon him (Phil) at the altar boys' camp. In 2002, the hierarchy paid a senior barrister, Mr Alec Southwell QC, to examine (and report on) Phil's complaint. Archbishop George Pell (who was indeed at the altar boys' camp) denied committing any abuse. Mr Southwell's report concluded that the former altar boy "appeared to speak honestly from an actual recollection". Mr Southwell said he was not persuaded that the former altar boy was a liar as alleged by Pell.
The following information is taken from Mr Southwell's report, which appeared for a while (in 2002) on the church's official website.
Mr Southwell's report says that, each January in the early 1960s, this camp on Phillip Island was attended by more than 40 boys from Melbourne's Braybrook parish. [This parish, nowadays known as the Maidstone-Braybrook parish, was in a low socio-economic area in Melbourne's west.] In the early 1960s, George Pell (then aged about 20) was among a group of trainee priests from the church's Melbourne seminary who attended the camp each year to spend time with the boys.
Here is Mr Southwell's summary of the allegations by the former altar boy:
'At the camp, during some form of activity in a tent (such as pillow fighting or wrestling), the respondent [George Pell], while facing the complainant, put his hand down the inside of the complainant's pants and got "a good handful" of his penis and testicles. There were other altar boys in the tent at the time, who were participating in the other playful activities. The complainant was shocked, since before that incident he had regarded the respondent as "a fun person, a gentle person, a kind person, he was a terrific bloke". On each of the few occasions this occurred, the complainant pulled the respondent's hand away.
'On two occasions, in a tent, the respondent [George Pell] took the complainant's hand, and guided it down the front of and inside the respondent's pants; the complainant pulled his hand away without having touched the respondent's genitals.
'In another incident, which "is not as clear as the other episodes", they were in the water, jumping the waves, when from one side the respondent [George Pell] put his hand down and inside the complainant's bathers and touched his genitals.
'On another occasion, during a walk away from the camp at night, they were walking in Indian file when the respondent [George Pell] grabbed the complainant from behind and put his hand down and inside of the complainant's pants.'
The complainant [who is referred to as "C" in Mr Southwell's report] alleged that he was not the only boy at the camp who was abused by George Pell. Calleged that he witnessed a friend of his (referred to as "A") being molested by "big George". C told George to "fuck off". Aand Clater protested by lighting a glass fire near the camp. Adied in 1985, and therefore he could not be questioned by the Southwell inquiry.
Another former altar boy (labelled as "H") told Mr Southwell that, at the Phillip Island camp, he was warned by both Cand Ato stay away from Big George.
Beginning in his teens, C's life was disrupted. He developed a problem with alcohol and gambling. In his early twenties he got into trouble with the law, serving time in jail for alcohol-related offences. He eventually overcame those problems and became a respectable citizen, acting as a volunteer in community groups to help vulnerable people who are in need.
In about 1975 (aged about 25), Ctold his then wife about having been molested by the trainee priest George. Mrs Cgave evidence to the Southwell inquiry confirming this. Eventually Calso told his children about the abuse.
In 2000, whenCrecognised Archbishop George Pell as the former trainee priest, Cdecided that the church should be informed about this. So, in 2000 he told his local parish priest [a prominent figure in Melbourne] about the alleged sexual abuse. Two years later, C decided to submit his complaint to the church's National Committee for Professional Standards. At first, the NCPS procrastinated in handling this complaint but eventually, fearing adverse publicity, the NCPS took the precaution of paying Mr Alec Southwell QC to examine, and report on, the allegation. The church designed its proposed process to require a very high standard of proof (much higher than the church usually requires when assessing a complaint about clergy sex abuse).
It is not known how much the Catholic Church authorities paid Mr Southwell, in total, for doing this job for them but members of the legal profession know how much a QC would be paid per day.
In his final report, Mr Southwell noted that "I must bear in mind that serious allegations are involved, and that an adverse finding [against Archbishop Pell] would in all probability have grave, indeed devastating, consequences for the respondent [Archbishop Pell]."
Mr Southwell said that criticisms of the complainant by Archbishop Pell's lawyer "do not persuade me that he [the complainant] is a liar."
"I did not form a positively adverse view of him [the complainant] as a witness."
Mr Southwell returned a balanced finding. Evidently, it was one man's word against another man's word. The Southwell report contains no mention of George Pell being exonerated.
Mr Southwell's report did not reveal the name of the former altar boy but a book by Australian author David Marr (entitled The Prince: Faith, Abuse and George Pell) gives the altar boy's name as Phil.
Southwell Report: Main pointsOn 30 September 2002, Mr Alex Southwell Q.C. began holding an inquiry, on behalf of the Catholic Church authorities, behind closed doors, in a conference room in Melbourne. Members of the public and the media were excluded.
Here are main points of the Southwell report, taken from the church website in October 2002 while the document was (temporarily) on that website:-
REPORT OF AN INQUIRY INTO AN ALLEGATION OF SEXUAL ABUSE AGAINST ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELLCommissioner: The Honourable A.J. Southwell Q.C.
INTRODUCTION
The National Committee for Professional Standards (N.C.P.S.) is a body set up by the Australian Catholic Bishops' Conference to receive inter alia, complaints of sexual abuse by Catholic priests. I have been appointed as Commissioner by Archbishop Phillip Wilson and Brother Michael Hill (Chairpersons of N.C.P.S. - "the appointors") to inquire into an allegation by "C" ("the complainant") that at Phillip Island, in 1961, he was on several occasions sexually abused by George Pell, now the Catholic Archbishop of Sydney ("the respondent").
It is as well to set out part of para 2 of the Terms of Reference which requires me to "enquire into and report upon the Complaint in accordance with the following Terms of Reference: The Commissioner shall make such enquiries and hold such hearings as he considers are necessary and appropriate in order for him to be satisfied as to whether or not the complaint has been established ...
In the event a hearing was conducted on 30 September, 1, 2, 3 and 4 October 2002. . .
Mr. Sher Q.C. appeared for the respondent ... and Mr. M. Tovey Q.C. for the complainant...
Early in the hearing it became apparent that there was considerable doubt whether the alleged molestation of the complainant took place at a camp in 1961 or 1962. As will be seen, the complainant, who stated his belief that he went to only one camp (and that belief was much in issue) fixed the date by reason of the fact that a fire occurred nearby during the camp in question, and enquiries of the Country Fire Authority ("C.F.A.") showed that they had attended a fire in the vicinity on 13th January 1961 (during the 1961 camp); accordingly, the complainant fixed that as the date of the relevant camp. However, extraordinarily enough, there was also a fire nearby at the camp of 1962; this information was gleaned from Christus Rex, the monthly newsletter of Braybrook parish; included in the article is the information that both the complainant and the respondent were at that camp. To ensure that the merits of the complaint could be properly investigated, I sought, and in due course obtained, an amendment to the Terms of Reference so that after the expression "in 1961" was added "or 1962".
BACKGROUND OF THE COMPLAINT
The complainant was born on *** 1949. His second primary school was Christ the King in Braybrook. His mother was a strict and devout Catholic and was keen for the complainant to follow that path. He became an altar boy at the church.
At that time an agency of the Catholic Church conducted a holiday camp during the summer at Phillip Island. In January 1961 and 1962, altar boys from the Braybrook church attended, probably 42 of them in 1961, and somewhat more in 1962. The camps were supervised by Father Donovan, assisted in 1961 by 4 seminarians from Corpus Christi College, Werribee, and about 6 in 1962. The respondent was present on each occasion, although probably not for the whole of the week in 1961. There was a bunkhouse in which some of the younger boys and some seminarians slept, the remainder sleeping in army style tents, which are depicted in photographs…
The complainant went to Grade 6 at the primary school, and then went to *** Technical School, he thinks in 1961…
THE COMPLAINT
The details of the complaint are as follows: at the camp, during some form of activity in a tent (such as pillow fighting or wrestling), the respondent, while facing the complainant, put his hand down the inside of the complainant's pants and got "a good handful" of his penis and testicles. There were other altar boys in the tent at the time, who were participating in the other playful activities. The complainant was shocked, since before that incident he had regarded the respondent as "a fun person, a gentle person, a kind person, he was a terrific bloke". On each of the few occasions this occurred, the complainant pulled the respondent's hand away. On two occasions, in a tent, the respondent took the complainant's hand, and guided it down the front of and inside the respondent's pants; the complainant pulled his hand away without having touched the respondent's genitals. In another incident, which "is not as clear as the other episodes", they were in the water, jumping the waves, when from one side the respondent put his hand down and inside the complainant's bathers and touched his genitals.
On another occasion, during a walk away from the camp at night, they were walking in Indian file when the respondent grabbed the complainant from behind and put his hand down and inside of the complainant's pants.
The complainant said that on each occasion in the tent, other boys were present, but the respondent so positioned himself that they may well have not been in a position to have seen it.
I should interpolate that other evidence showed that it would occasion no surprise that a seminarian would be in a tent occupied by the boys - it could be in fun, or perhaps to restore order or otherwise settle the boys down.
The complainant agreed that he then made no complaint to any person other than his friend "A" (who died in 1985).
The complainant said that on one occasion he saw the respondent similarly molest "A", who turned away and told the respondent to "fuck off".
The complainant said that apart from the physical opposition, he did not remonstrate with the respondent; indeed he said that the only conversation with the respondent that he could actually recall was of the respondent telling him (and, I gather, possibly others) that he had played football in the ruck with Richmond reserves. The respondent denied having said that; he had indeed signed to play with Richmond in his final school year, but had not in fact trained or played with Richmond. V.F.L. (now A.F.L.) records have no trace of the respondent having so played.
The complainant (and other witnesses, including adults) said that among the boys the respondent was known as "big George", understandably enough. The respondent was not so addressed to his face, and said he was unaware of the nickname.
The respondent was born on 8 June 1941; he ended schooling as captain of St. Patrick's College in 1959; he studied for the priesthood and was ordained in 1966; after various positions, he was in 1987, at the age of about 46, appointed Auxiliary Bishop of the Melbourne Archdiocese; among other posts he was a member of the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith from 1990 to 2000; in 1996 he was appointed Archbishop of Melbourne; on 26 March 2001 his appointment as Archbishop of Sydney was announced and he was installed as Archbishop on 10 May 2001…
The respondent wholly denied every allegation of having touched the complainant or "A”…
The complainant said that he used to discuss the molestation with "A"; that one day "A" ran away from the camp; the complainant found him, and "A" said he could not stand any further molestation; "A" had a box of matches, and said he was "going to burn the place down"; they lit a fire which became a grass fire out of control but which was brought under control by the C.F.A. At the hearing it was proven that in fact the C.F.A. extinguished a grass fire in that area on 13th January 1961.
The complainant said that in about 1975 he had told his then wife (from whom he has been separated for some years) and much later his children, of the molestation; and that one night in about May 2000 he was watching television, when news came on concerning the respondent; that he immediately recognised his molester - "the same face and the same loping walk"; he was shocked - he did not think it right that someone who had acted as the respondent had should lead the Church…
In about 2000, after attending with a friend, "D", a meeting of Alcoholics Anonymous, at which sexual abuse was discussed, he told "D" of the molestation, and was advised by him to consult his parish priest.
In May this year [2002] he decided to make a formal complaint; he discussed it with his friend, Father "F", the parish priest at *** and he thereafter was referred to the N.C.P.S., where he was interviewed by "G", the executive director…
THE NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS
In his final address, although not specifically abandoning his earlier concession that the inquiry was "not bound by the rules of evidence," Mr. Sher submitted that the question of admissibility should be considered as if the inquiry was a proceeding "analogous to a criminal trial". He underlined the obvious fact that "an adverse finding would be nothing short of disastrous for (the respondent) and the Church". . .
THE STANDARD OF PROOF
Although this is not a criminal proceeding requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt, I must bear in mind that serious allegations are involved, and that an adverse finding would in all probability have grave, indeed devastating, consequences for the respondent. . .
EVIDENCE PUT IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT
. . ."H", a patently honest witness, said that he left Christ the King school at the end of 1960, and the 1961 camp was the last he attended. "A", the complainant and the respondent were among those present. He remembers various frolicking activities, and a night walk where the boys were spread out.
However, no-one at the inquiry suggested that the references in the Christus Rex parish newsletter of February 1962 were other than accurate, and the lengthy note of the 1962 camp included "H"'s name among the altar boys present. It follows that his honest recollection as to the date of his last camp is in all probability mistaken, a fact which underlines the great difficulty of fact finding in relation to incidents occurring 40 years ago.
He said he had a clear recollection of "A", who, although about seven months younger, "always tended to look after me a bit and he came up to me and he said to me one day, "just watch out for Big George", and thereafter "I didn't get too close to him". . .
DELAY IN COMPLAINING
As has been stated, the complainant first complained to anybody in the Church when he spoke to Father "F"; the latter arranged the meeting with "G", which took place on 11 June 2002. Accordingly the first formal complaint was made more than 40 years after the event, and it follows that the respondent thereafter first heard of it.
Common sense and high legal authority tell us of the unfairness which may arise from long delay, because of the difficulty in defending such a stale complaint. . .
Accordingly I accept as correct (as do the other counsel in this inquiry) the submission of Mr. Sher that I should give myself a warning along the lines of what would be required in a criminal trial. To say that is not to change my view that the strict rules of a criminal trial do not apply, but to acknowledge that common fairness demands that to keep such a warning in mind.
THE EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINT
The first complaint was said to have been made to Mrs. "C", the wife of the complainant, in about 1975, that is, some 14 years after the incident. She separated from the complainant about 10 years ago; they see each other occasionally (she has lived in *** for some time) in relation principally to visits by or matters concerning their off-spring.
Mrs. "C" said that in about 1975 or 1976 the complainant told her that when he was an altar boy at a camp at Phillip Island he had been interfered with by a "big bastard called George". He said that "A" was involved in it".
She had a clear recollection of the conversation; she was shocked by it; she could not recall how the subject first arose, or the conversation immediately preceding the statement. After that, the matter was "swept under the carpet" and was not further discussed until much more recent times.
Although Mr. Sher offered a number of criticisms of her evidence as to interest and recollection ("how could she remember a common name like "George" after all those years"), as I indicated during the final address of Mr. Sher, I regarded her as impressive witness, who had a clear recollection of a startling statement.
As stated, Mr. Sher objected to the evidence; the principal thrust of the submission was that upon the authorities, evidence of a complaint could not be admitted unless it was made at the first opportunity - R. v. Freeman [1980] V.R.I.
It is perhaps a moot point whether the evidence would have been admissible upon a criminal trial to rebut a suggestion of recent invention. It was the complainant's version that, although he always knew his molester as "big George", it was not until he saw the respondent on television in the year 2000 that he identified the respondent as "big George". (There can be no doubt that "big George" was the respondent). . .
As to motive, it should be noted that extensive enquiries made on behalf of the respondent have unearthed no evidence of any other matter or incident which might have aroused spite or malice on the part of the complainant towards either the respondent or the Church. On the other hand, the respondent has had a strong motive to push memory (if there ever was memory) of these fleeting incidents by a 19 year old into the recesses of the mind, from which there could be no recall.
CREDIBILITY OF THE COMPLAINANT
The complainant's credibility was subjected to a forceful attack. By the age of about 20 years, the complainant had an alcohol problem; at some later stage, he had become an alcoholic; in 1984 his wife took him to an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting, but he had not been drinking then for about 18 months. He has attended such meetings intermittently ever since; it appears that he has not had any problem with alcohol since 1979.
The complainant has been before the court on many occasions, resulting in 39 convictions from about 20 court appearances. Most of the convictions involved drink-driving or assaults, between 1969 (when he was aged 20 years) and 1975…
Mrs. "C" said that in about July 2000 the complainant rang her expressing astonishment that he had just recognised his molester as "George Pell". She did not know who that was so she asked, and was told by the complainant that "he is an Archbishop".
She fixed the date, first, by believing it was more than two years ago and secondly, by the fact that she had then just started a new job, and that was in July 2000, a job about which she was "bit agitated". I have earlier said that I accept Mrs. "C" as an honest witness, and I believe that she is probably correct in fixing the date of the relevant conversation.
"D" has been a friend of the complainant for over 20 years; they met at an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting; they meet every few months, perhaps at a meeting, perhaps for dinner or coffee. In June or July 2000, after an A.A. meeting, they went to Williamstown cafe for coffee, where the complainant told him that at a camp years ago George Pell had molested him (he described the act complained of); "D" suggested the complainant should seek counselling from his parish priest...
The other criticisms of the complainant's credit made by Mr. Sher do not persuade me that he is a liar…
I did not form a positively adverse view of him as a witness
I accept as correct the submission of Mr. Tovey that the complainant, when giving evidence of molesting, gave the impression that he was speaking honestly from an actual recollection.
However, the respondent, also, gave me the impression that he was speaking the truth.
CONCLUSION
In the end, and notwithstanding that impression of the complainant, bearing in mind the forensic difficulties of the defence occasioned by the very long delay, some valid criticism of the complainant's credibility, the lack of corroborative evidence and the sworn denial of the respondent, I find I am not "satisfied that the complaint has been established", to quote the words of the principal term of reference.
I so advise the appointors.
Hon. A.J. Southwell Q.C.
The above main points from Mr Southwell’s report were downloaded in October 2002 from the website of the Catholic Church at:http://www.catholic.org.au/statements/pell_judgement.htm
Later comments
Stephen Crittenden:It was also an annus horribilis for Sydney’s Archbishop George Pell. First, ambushed by 60 Minutes over allegations that he attempted to bribe a victim of clerical sexual abuse to keep quiet; then the subject of a complaint of a sexual advance at an altar boy camp forty years ago. Those allegations led to Dr Pell standing aside while an inquiry was conducted by a retired Victorian Supreme Court judge, Alex Southwell QC. Well as we know, following the release of Mr Southwell’s report, Archbishop Pell returned to office, but he declined to be interviewed on this program. As a result, we were unable to ask how he could claim to have been exonerated, when the leading newspaper in the city where he’s the Archbishop says he has not been. Here’s the conclusion of the Sydney Morning Herald editorial of Wednesday, October 16.
Reader:Mr Southwell’s conclusion is exquisitely balanced. He accepts “that the complainant, when giving evidence of molesting, gave the impression that he was speaking honestly from an actual recollection”. However, he says Dr Pell “also gave me the impression he was speaking the truth”. A significant part of Mr Southwell’s report concerns the standard of proof; because he considered what was alleged against Dr Pell as serious, he was inclined to apply a strict burden, akin to the “beyond reasonable doubt” of criminal proceedings. That helped Dr Pell. It also made Mr Southwell’s careful conclusion – that he could not be “satisfied that the complaint has been established” – rather less than a complete exoneration.
Stephen Crittenden:In other words, Mr Southwell’s verdict seems to have an affinity with the Scottish verdict of “case not proven”…
Australia's Catholic Church hierarchy received a complaint in 2002 that a trainee priest (George Pell) had sexually abused a twelve-year-old altar boy (named Phil) in 1961-1962 at a holiday camp for boys on Phillip Island, south-east of Melbourne. According to a church document, Phil has alleged that, on several occasions, the trainee priest George Pell (then about 20) thrust his hand down the inside of Phil's pants and got "a good handful" of the boy's penis and testicles; and, on other occasions, George Pell allegedly tried to guide the boy's hand into the front of Pell's pants. By the year 2000, when Phil was aged 50, he realised that the trainee priest George Pell had risen to become an Archbishop. Phil was shocked — "he did not think it right that someone who had behaved indecently towards children should lead the church," the church document says. So, beginning in 2000, Phil tried to alert the church authorities. Phil emphasised that he was notseeking compensation. And he was not reporting this matter to the police (therefore there is nopolice investigation into Phil's complaint). Rather, Phil was concerned about the safety of children in the church's care; and he merely wanted the church authorities to be aware of the offences that were allegedly committed upon him (Phil) at the altar boys' camp. In 2002, the hierarchy paid a senior barrister, Mr Alec Southwell QC, to examine (and report on) Phil's complaint. Archbishop George Pell (who was indeed at the altar boys' camp) denied committing any abuse. Mr Southwell's report concluded that the former altar boy "appeared to speak honestly from an actual recollection". Mr Southwell said he was not persuaded that the former altar boy was a liar as alleged by Pell.
The following information is taken from Mr Southwell's report, which appeared for a while (in 2002) on the church's official website.
Mr Southwell's report says that, each January in the early 1960s, this camp on Phillip Island was attended by more than 40 boys from Melbourne's Braybrook parish. [This parish, nowadays known as the Maidstone-Braybrook parish, was in a low socio-economic area in Melbourne's west.] In the early 1960s, George Pell (then aged about 20) was among a group of trainee priests from the church's Melbourne seminary who attended the camp each year to spend time with the boys.
Here is Mr Southwell's summary of the allegations by the former altar boy:
'At the camp, during some form of activity in a tent (such as pillow fighting or wrestling), the respondent [George Pell], while facing the complainant, put his hand down the inside of the complainant's pants and got "a good handful" of his penis and testicles. There were other altar boys in the tent at the time, who were participating in the other playful activities. The complainant was shocked, since before that incident he had regarded the respondent as "a fun person, a gentle person, a kind person, he was a terrific bloke". On each of the few occasions this occurred, the complainant pulled the respondent's hand away.
'On two occasions, in a tent, the respondent [George Pell] took the complainant's hand, and guided it down the front of and inside the respondent's pants; the complainant pulled his hand away without having touched the respondent's genitals.
'In another incident, which "is not as clear as the other episodes", they were in the water, jumping the waves, when from one side the respondent [George Pell] put his hand down and inside the complainant's bathers and touched his genitals.
'On another occasion, during a walk away from the camp at night, they were walking in Indian file when the respondent [George Pell] grabbed the complainant from behind and put his hand down and inside of the complainant's pants.'
The complainant [who is referred to as "C" in Mr Southwell's report] alleged that he was not the only boy at the camp who was abused by George Pell. Calleged that he witnessed a friend of his (referred to as "A") being molested by "big George". C told George to "fuck off". Aand Clater protested by lighting a glass fire near the camp. Adied in 1985, and therefore he could not be questioned by the Southwell inquiry.
Another former altar boy (labelled as "H") told Mr Southwell that, at the Phillip Island camp, he was warned by both Cand Ato stay away from Big George.
Beginning in his teens, C's life was disrupted. He developed a problem with alcohol and gambling. In his early twenties he got into trouble with the law, serving time in jail for alcohol-related offences. He eventually overcame those problems and became a respectable citizen, acting as a volunteer in community groups to help vulnerable people who are in need.
In about 1975 (aged about 25), Ctold his then wife about having been molested by the trainee priest George. Mrs Cgave evidence to the Southwell inquiry confirming this. Eventually Calso told his children about the abuse.
In 2000, whenCrecognised Archbishop George Pell as the former trainee priest, Cdecided that the church should be informed about this. So, in 2000 he told his local parish priest [a prominent figure in Melbourne] about the alleged sexual abuse. Two years later, C decided to submit his complaint to the church's National Committee for Professional Standards. At first, the NCPS procrastinated in handling this complaint but eventually, fearing adverse publicity, the NCPS took the precaution of paying Mr Alec Southwell QC to examine, and report on, the allegation. The church designed its proposed process to require a very high standard of proof (much higher than the church usually requires when assessing a complaint about clergy sex abuse).
It is not known how much the Catholic Church authorities paid Mr Southwell, in total, for doing this job for them but members of the legal profession know how much a QC would be paid per day.
In his final report, Mr Southwell noted that "I must bear in mind that serious allegations are involved, and that an adverse finding [against Archbishop Pell] would in all probability have grave, indeed devastating, consequences for the respondent [Archbishop Pell]."
Mr Southwell said that criticisms of the complainant by Archbishop Pell's lawyer "do not persuade me that he [the complainant] is a liar."
"I did not form a positively adverse view of him [the complainant] as a witness."
Mr Southwell returned a balanced finding. Evidently, it was one man's word against another man's word. The Southwell report contains no mention of George Pell being exonerated.
Mr Southwell's report did not reveal the name of the former altar boy but a book by Australian author David Marr (entitled The Prince: Faith, Abuse and George Pell) gives the altar boy's name as Phil.
Southwell Report: Main pointsOn 30 September 2002, Mr Alex Southwell Q.C. began holding an inquiry, on behalf of the Catholic Church authorities, behind closed doors, in a conference room in Melbourne. Members of the public and the media were excluded.
Here are main points of the Southwell report, taken from the church website in October 2002 while the document was (temporarily) on that website:-
REPORT OF AN INQUIRY INTO AN ALLEGATION OF SEXUAL ABUSE AGAINST ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELLCommissioner: The Honourable A.J. Southwell Q.C.
INTRODUCTION
The National Committee for Professional Standards (N.C.P.S.) is a body set up by the Australian Catholic Bishops' Conference to receive inter alia, complaints of sexual abuse by Catholic priests. I have been appointed as Commissioner by Archbishop Phillip Wilson and Brother Michael Hill (Chairpersons of N.C.P.S. - "the appointors") to inquire into an allegation by "C" ("the complainant") that at Phillip Island, in 1961, he was on several occasions sexually abused by George Pell, now the Catholic Archbishop of Sydney ("the respondent").
It is as well to set out part of para 2 of the Terms of Reference which requires me to "enquire into and report upon the Complaint in accordance with the following Terms of Reference: The Commissioner shall make such enquiries and hold such hearings as he considers are necessary and appropriate in order for him to be satisfied as to whether or not the complaint has been established ...
In the event a hearing was conducted on 30 September, 1, 2, 3 and 4 October 2002. . .
Mr. Sher Q.C. appeared for the respondent ... and Mr. M. Tovey Q.C. for the complainant...
Early in the hearing it became apparent that there was considerable doubt whether the alleged molestation of the complainant took place at a camp in 1961 or 1962. As will be seen, the complainant, who stated his belief that he went to only one camp (and that belief was much in issue) fixed the date by reason of the fact that a fire occurred nearby during the camp in question, and enquiries of the Country Fire Authority ("C.F.A.") showed that they had attended a fire in the vicinity on 13th January 1961 (during the 1961 camp); accordingly, the complainant fixed that as the date of the relevant camp. However, extraordinarily enough, there was also a fire nearby at the camp of 1962; this information was gleaned from Christus Rex, the monthly newsletter of Braybrook parish; included in the article is the information that both the complainant and the respondent were at that camp. To ensure that the merits of the complaint could be properly investigated, I sought, and in due course obtained, an amendment to the Terms of Reference so that after the expression "in 1961" was added "or 1962".
BACKGROUND OF THE COMPLAINT
The complainant was born on *** 1949. His second primary school was Christ the King in Braybrook. His mother was a strict and devout Catholic and was keen for the complainant to follow that path. He became an altar boy at the church.
At that time an agency of the Catholic Church conducted a holiday camp during the summer at Phillip Island. In January 1961 and 1962, altar boys from the Braybrook church attended, probably 42 of them in 1961, and somewhat more in 1962. The camps were supervised by Father Donovan, assisted in 1961 by 4 seminarians from Corpus Christi College, Werribee, and about 6 in 1962. The respondent was present on each occasion, although probably not for the whole of the week in 1961. There was a bunkhouse in which some of the younger boys and some seminarians slept, the remainder sleeping in army style tents, which are depicted in photographs…
The complainant went to Grade 6 at the primary school, and then went to *** Technical School, he thinks in 1961…
THE COMPLAINT
The details of the complaint are as follows: at the camp, during some form of activity in a tent (such as pillow fighting or wrestling), the respondent, while facing the complainant, put his hand down the inside of the complainant's pants and got "a good handful" of his penis and testicles. There were other altar boys in the tent at the time, who were participating in the other playful activities. The complainant was shocked, since before that incident he had regarded the respondent as "a fun person, a gentle person, a kind person, he was a terrific bloke". On each of the few occasions this occurred, the complainant pulled the respondent's hand away. On two occasions, in a tent, the respondent took the complainant's hand, and guided it down the front of and inside the respondent's pants; the complainant pulled his hand away without having touched the respondent's genitals. In another incident, which "is not as clear as the other episodes", they were in the water, jumping the waves, when from one side the respondent put his hand down and inside the complainant's bathers and touched his genitals.
On another occasion, during a walk away from the camp at night, they were walking in Indian file when the respondent grabbed the complainant from behind and put his hand down and inside of the complainant's pants.
The complainant said that on each occasion in the tent, other boys were present, but the respondent so positioned himself that they may well have not been in a position to have seen it.
I should interpolate that other evidence showed that it would occasion no surprise that a seminarian would be in a tent occupied by the boys - it could be in fun, or perhaps to restore order or otherwise settle the boys down.
The complainant agreed that he then made no complaint to any person other than his friend "A" (who died in 1985).
The complainant said that on one occasion he saw the respondent similarly molest "A", who turned away and told the respondent to "fuck off".
The complainant said that apart from the physical opposition, he did not remonstrate with the respondent; indeed he said that the only conversation with the respondent that he could actually recall was of the respondent telling him (and, I gather, possibly others) that he had played football in the ruck with Richmond reserves. The respondent denied having said that; he had indeed signed to play with Richmond in his final school year, but had not in fact trained or played with Richmond. V.F.L. (now A.F.L.) records have no trace of the respondent having so played.
The complainant (and other witnesses, including adults) said that among the boys the respondent was known as "big George", understandably enough. The respondent was not so addressed to his face, and said he was unaware of the nickname.
The respondent was born on 8 June 1941; he ended schooling as captain of St. Patrick's College in 1959; he studied for the priesthood and was ordained in 1966; after various positions, he was in 1987, at the age of about 46, appointed Auxiliary Bishop of the Melbourne Archdiocese; among other posts he was a member of the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith from 1990 to 2000; in 1996 he was appointed Archbishop of Melbourne; on 26 March 2001 his appointment as Archbishop of Sydney was announced and he was installed as Archbishop on 10 May 2001…
The respondent wholly denied every allegation of having touched the complainant or "A”…
The complainant said that he used to discuss the molestation with "A"; that one day "A" ran away from the camp; the complainant found him, and "A" said he could not stand any further molestation; "A" had a box of matches, and said he was "going to burn the place down"; they lit a fire which became a grass fire out of control but which was brought under control by the C.F.A. At the hearing it was proven that in fact the C.F.A. extinguished a grass fire in that area on 13th January 1961.
The complainant said that in about 1975 he had told his then wife (from whom he has been separated for some years) and much later his children, of the molestation; and that one night in about May 2000 he was watching television, when news came on concerning the respondent; that he immediately recognised his molester - "the same face and the same loping walk"; he was shocked - he did not think it right that someone who had acted as the respondent had should lead the Church…
In about 2000, after attending with a friend, "D", a meeting of Alcoholics Anonymous, at which sexual abuse was discussed, he told "D" of the molestation, and was advised by him to consult his parish priest.
In May this year [2002] he decided to make a formal complaint; he discussed it with his friend, Father "F", the parish priest at *** and he thereafter was referred to the N.C.P.S., where he was interviewed by "G", the executive director…
THE NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS
In his final address, although not specifically abandoning his earlier concession that the inquiry was "not bound by the rules of evidence," Mr. Sher submitted that the question of admissibility should be considered as if the inquiry was a proceeding "analogous to a criminal trial". He underlined the obvious fact that "an adverse finding would be nothing short of disastrous for (the respondent) and the Church". . .
THE STANDARD OF PROOF
Although this is not a criminal proceeding requiring proof beyond reasonable doubt, I must bear in mind that serious allegations are involved, and that an adverse finding would in all probability have grave, indeed devastating, consequences for the respondent. . .
EVIDENCE PUT IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT
. . ."H", a patently honest witness, said that he left Christ the King school at the end of 1960, and the 1961 camp was the last he attended. "A", the complainant and the respondent were among those present. He remembers various frolicking activities, and a night walk where the boys were spread out.
However, no-one at the inquiry suggested that the references in the Christus Rex parish newsletter of February 1962 were other than accurate, and the lengthy note of the 1962 camp included "H"'s name among the altar boys present. It follows that his honest recollection as to the date of his last camp is in all probability mistaken, a fact which underlines the great difficulty of fact finding in relation to incidents occurring 40 years ago.
He said he had a clear recollection of "A", who, although about seven months younger, "always tended to look after me a bit and he came up to me and he said to me one day, "just watch out for Big George", and thereafter "I didn't get too close to him". . .
DELAY IN COMPLAINING
As has been stated, the complainant first complained to anybody in the Church when he spoke to Father "F"; the latter arranged the meeting with "G", which took place on 11 June 2002. Accordingly the first formal complaint was made more than 40 years after the event, and it follows that the respondent thereafter first heard of it.
Common sense and high legal authority tell us of the unfairness which may arise from long delay, because of the difficulty in defending such a stale complaint. . .
Accordingly I accept as correct (as do the other counsel in this inquiry) the submission of Mr. Sher that I should give myself a warning along the lines of what would be required in a criminal trial. To say that is not to change my view that the strict rules of a criminal trial do not apply, but to acknowledge that common fairness demands that to keep such a warning in mind.
THE EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINT
The first complaint was said to have been made to Mrs. "C", the wife of the complainant, in about 1975, that is, some 14 years after the incident. She separated from the complainant about 10 years ago; they see each other occasionally (she has lived in *** for some time) in relation principally to visits by or matters concerning their off-spring.
Mrs. "C" said that in about 1975 or 1976 the complainant told her that when he was an altar boy at a camp at Phillip Island he had been interfered with by a "big bastard called George". He said that "A" was involved in it".
She had a clear recollection of the conversation; she was shocked by it; she could not recall how the subject first arose, or the conversation immediately preceding the statement. After that, the matter was "swept under the carpet" and was not further discussed until much more recent times.
Although Mr. Sher offered a number of criticisms of her evidence as to interest and recollection ("how could she remember a common name like "George" after all those years"), as I indicated during the final address of Mr. Sher, I regarded her as impressive witness, who had a clear recollection of a startling statement.
As stated, Mr. Sher objected to the evidence; the principal thrust of the submission was that upon the authorities, evidence of a complaint could not be admitted unless it was made at the first opportunity - R. v. Freeman [1980] V.R.I.
It is perhaps a moot point whether the evidence would have been admissible upon a criminal trial to rebut a suggestion of recent invention. It was the complainant's version that, although he always knew his molester as "big George", it was not until he saw the respondent on television in the year 2000 that he identified the respondent as "big George". (There can be no doubt that "big George" was the respondent). . .
As to motive, it should be noted that extensive enquiries made on behalf of the respondent have unearthed no evidence of any other matter or incident which might have aroused spite or malice on the part of the complainant towards either the respondent or the Church. On the other hand, the respondent has had a strong motive to push memory (if there ever was memory) of these fleeting incidents by a 19 year old into the recesses of the mind, from which there could be no recall.
CREDIBILITY OF THE COMPLAINANT
The complainant's credibility was subjected to a forceful attack. By the age of about 20 years, the complainant had an alcohol problem; at some later stage, he had become an alcoholic; in 1984 his wife took him to an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting, but he had not been drinking then for about 18 months. He has attended such meetings intermittently ever since; it appears that he has not had any problem with alcohol since 1979.
The complainant has been before the court on many occasions, resulting in 39 convictions from about 20 court appearances. Most of the convictions involved drink-driving or assaults, between 1969 (when he was aged 20 years) and 1975…
Mrs. "C" said that in about July 2000 the complainant rang her expressing astonishment that he had just recognised his molester as "George Pell". She did not know who that was so she asked, and was told by the complainant that "he is an Archbishop".
She fixed the date, first, by believing it was more than two years ago and secondly, by the fact that she had then just started a new job, and that was in July 2000, a job about which she was "bit agitated". I have earlier said that I accept Mrs. "C" as an honest witness, and I believe that she is probably correct in fixing the date of the relevant conversation.
"D" has been a friend of the complainant for over 20 years; they met at an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting; they meet every few months, perhaps at a meeting, perhaps for dinner or coffee. In June or July 2000, after an A.A. meeting, they went to Williamstown cafe for coffee, where the complainant told him that at a camp years ago George Pell had molested him (he described the act complained of); "D" suggested the complainant should seek counselling from his parish priest...
The other criticisms of the complainant's credit made by Mr. Sher do not persuade me that he is a liar…
I did not form a positively adverse view of him as a witness
I accept as correct the submission of Mr. Tovey that the complainant, when giving evidence of molesting, gave the impression that he was speaking honestly from an actual recollection.
However, the respondent, also, gave me the impression that he was speaking the truth.
CONCLUSION
In the end, and notwithstanding that impression of the complainant, bearing in mind the forensic difficulties of the defence occasioned by the very long delay, some valid criticism of the complainant's credibility, the lack of corroborative evidence and the sworn denial of the respondent, I find I am not "satisfied that the complaint has been established", to quote the words of the principal term of reference.
I so advise the appointors.
Hon. A.J. Southwell Q.C.
The above main points from Mr Southwell’s report were downloaded in October 2002 from the website of the Catholic Church at:http://www.catholic.org.au/statements/pell_judgement.htm
Later comments
- Following is a transcript from the ABC Radio National, “Religion Report”, 18 December 2002, presented by Stephen Crittenden, summarising some of the events of 2002:-
Stephen Crittenden:It was also an annus horribilis for Sydney’s Archbishop George Pell. First, ambushed by 60 Minutes over allegations that he attempted to bribe a victim of clerical sexual abuse to keep quiet; then the subject of a complaint of a sexual advance at an altar boy camp forty years ago. Those allegations led to Dr Pell standing aside while an inquiry was conducted by a retired Victorian Supreme Court judge, Alex Southwell QC. Well as we know, following the release of Mr Southwell’s report, Archbishop Pell returned to office, but he declined to be interviewed on this program. As a result, we were unable to ask how he could claim to have been exonerated, when the leading newspaper in the city where he’s the Archbishop says he has not been. Here’s the conclusion of the Sydney Morning Herald editorial of Wednesday, October 16.
Reader:Mr Southwell’s conclusion is exquisitely balanced. He accepts “that the complainant, when giving evidence of molesting, gave the impression that he was speaking honestly from an actual recollection”. However, he says Dr Pell “also gave me the impression he was speaking the truth”. A significant part of Mr Southwell’s report concerns the standard of proof; because he considered what was alleged against Dr Pell as serious, he was inclined to apply a strict burden, akin to the “beyond reasonable doubt” of criminal proceedings. That helped Dr Pell. It also made Mr Southwell’s careful conclusion – that he could not be “satisfied that the complaint has been established” – rather less than a complete exoneration.
Stephen Crittenden:In other words, Mr Southwell’s verdict seems to have an affinity with the Scottish verdict of “case not proven”…
- The Southwell report is discussed in a book by David Marr (The Prince: Faith, Abuse and George Pell), published by Black Inc (an imprint of Schwarz Publishing Pty Ltd), Melbourne, in 2013 and in an enlarged second edition in 2014. This discussion is on pages 11-12 and 70-72 in the 2013 edition and on pages 23-24 and 125-130 in the 2014 edition.
Sins of Omertà
There are approximately 5,100 Bishops and 214 Cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church, all knew and know about the rape and abuse of millions of Children by their Clerics, and themselves, even the Popes knew. Sexually abusive Bishops or Cardinals are exceptionally dangerous to any child around the world, we need to take a stand and dismantle this criminal filth Cult, IMMEDIATELY.
There is the very real possibility that the Roman Catholic Church was a criminal conspiracy from its very conception and that criminal acts have been committed and continue to be committed daily. Now for the first time in world history, a sitting Cardinal, George Pell of Australia has been convicted in a criminal court in Australia of the rape of a 12 year old altar boy. Before that conviction, any talk of any of the Catholic Bishops, Archbishops or Cardinals received little or no scrutiny in the world-wide press.They were about reproach, untouchable and very holy, according to the press. The world press forgot that they, the Bishops were all too human. Quote-Beyond Good and Evil, Part II- Aphorism 35- by Nietzsche —-
O Voltaire! O humanity! O nonsense! There’s something about the "truth," about the search for truth. And when someone goes after it in far too human a way -"il ne cherche le vrai que pour faire le bien" [he seeks the truth only to do good] - I’ll wager he comes up with nothing!
The main ingredients of the toxic Catholic Church are, raping children, lying, cheating, and manipulation. Take for example the details in the recent Philadelphia Report on Rape committed by the Catholic Church and issued by the Philadelphia Grand Jury this year, 2018, which was so disturbing — that one section of the Philadelphia Report describes a Gang of roaming Pedophile Priests, who Raped their child victims with Crucifixes — please what sick organisation rapes children and then again violates the same children afterwards with Crucifixes.
Many Catholic people have called it “Moral Catastrophe.” the accusations of sexual deviance, shameless lies and deceitful Churchmen. “The trust between the Catholic Church’s Hierarchy and the people in the pews has been destroyed.” Catholic Theologians, Scholars and Lay Leaders began circulating a petition a few weeks ago urging all 271 active Bishops in the Catholic Church in the United States to step down. The Catholic Church is “criminally, morally reprehensible organisation. Due to degradation in moral, the Roman Catholic Church will disintegrate and every Catholic bears the brunt thereof. This medieval Cult faced with the prospect of almost certainly dying in a very short time. Continued cases of child rape in every country, and many other vile acts which are unethical and sinful to contemporary Christian societies, still take place. The congregation of people in every land have lost trust in Mother Church and God, itself, since neither can provide a cure or safety from the pestilence of sex scandals plaguing the rottenness that is the Roman Catholic Cult.
When a Priest is accused of sexual rape, his local Bishop who is also an offender is unlikely to punish the Priest and instead will certainly never inform the local police. The local police in most cases will never act, out of fear of the power of the very powerful Catholic Church. The local Bishop is now a willing enabler of the sexual crimes of his local Priest, harming not only the child, but all local children in his parish. The Priest will rape with impunity until he, the local Priest is moved to another parish, where he will start up again, destroying more children’s lives, continuing the cycle of rape, cover-ups and fear.
In the Catholic Church, “Sexual rape and corruption is conferred from the top down, from corrupt pedophile men in power. The Catholic Bishops who sexually abuse seminarians, and most did, establishing a genealogy of rape, setting up a pattern of institutional secrecy, similarly to the Mafia’s Omertà. But omertà literally means "manhood" and refers to the idea of a man dealing with his own criminal problems without the help of either the police or the lawful law. As we come to know the term, Omertà has also become synonymous with the Mafia's code of silence. The Catholic Church have cleverly used Omertà with great skill and success, continues to do so to this very day.
This code of Omertà, used by the Catholic Church allows the code of silence that places importance on complete silence in the face of questioning by authorities or outsiders; non-cooperation with authorities, the government, or outsiders; and wilfully ignoring and generally avoiding interference with the illegal activities of its Bishops and Priests, for example, not contacting law enforcement or the authorities when one is aware of, witness to, or even the victim of certain crimes. Especially crimes of rape against children, retaliation against informers, the innocent children, is common in Catholic Church circles, where the adult children, now known as mental misfits are subject to continued attacks on their character, their manhoods and their self esteem. A common used ploy of this criminal Cult, the Roman Catholic Church. The categorical prohibition of cooperation with any state authorities, like the Police or Government is an absolute no-no, and is enforced by the active enablers at the Vatican.
According to the Vatican, the Police and Government officials should absolutely avoid interfering in the business of the Catholic Church. The Vatican has decreed that its Clerics should never inform the lawful authorities of a crime under any circumstances. The Vatican enforces Omertà which is an extreme form of loyalty and solidarity in the face of any outside authority. One of the absolute tenets of the Roman Catholic Church is that it is deeply demeaning and shameful to betray the sins of the Roman Catholic Church to outside authorities.
The Mafia’s most famous proverb and by extension the Roman Catholic Church’s, is —-“Cu è surdu, orbu e taci, campa cent'anni ‘mpaci" - “He who is deaf, blind and silent will live a hundred years in peace". For that reason, many Catholic Church-related crimes go unreported, after all they are the original Mafia, with over 2,000 years of corrupt history to back them up. Judges, lawyers and politicians have a license to steal and lie, we the Catholic Church don’t need one, we have God, they scream. The Catholic Church turns its trained teenage boys in its seminaries into mindless, sloven minded men, as the newly qualified Priests quickly turn themselves into useful idiots and pedophiles. As Cardinal Pellophile wish he had said,— quoting a dead Mafia Boss-
“This life of ours, this is a wonderful life. If you can get through life like this and get away with it, hey, that’s great. But its very, very unpredictable. There’s so many ways you can screw it up, sex with children is one, just don’t ever get caught and never, ever tell”. --Owen Felix O’Neill
There are approximately 5,100 Bishops and 214 Cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church, all knew and know about the rape and abuse of millions of Children by their Clerics, and themselves, even the Popes knew. Sexually abusive Bishops or Cardinals are exceptionally dangerous to any child around the world, we need to take a stand and dismantle this criminal filth Cult, IMMEDIATELY.
There is the very real possibility that the Roman Catholic Church was a criminal conspiracy from its very conception and that criminal acts have been committed and continue to be committed daily. Now for the first time in world history, a sitting Cardinal, George Pell of Australia has been convicted in a criminal court in Australia of the rape of a 12 year old altar boy. Before that conviction, any talk of any of the Catholic Bishops, Archbishops or Cardinals received little or no scrutiny in the world-wide press.They were about reproach, untouchable and very holy, according to the press. The world press forgot that they, the Bishops were all too human. Quote-Beyond Good and Evil, Part II- Aphorism 35- by Nietzsche —-
O Voltaire! O humanity! O nonsense! There’s something about the "truth," about the search for truth. And when someone goes after it in far too human a way -"il ne cherche le vrai que pour faire le bien" [he seeks the truth only to do good] - I’ll wager he comes up with nothing!
The main ingredients of the toxic Catholic Church are, raping children, lying, cheating, and manipulation. Take for example the details in the recent Philadelphia Report on Rape committed by the Catholic Church and issued by the Philadelphia Grand Jury this year, 2018, which was so disturbing — that one section of the Philadelphia Report describes a Gang of roaming Pedophile Priests, who Raped their child victims with Crucifixes — please what sick organisation rapes children and then again violates the same children afterwards with Crucifixes.
Many Catholic people have called it “Moral Catastrophe.” the accusations of sexual deviance, shameless lies and deceitful Churchmen. “The trust between the Catholic Church’s Hierarchy and the people in the pews has been destroyed.” Catholic Theologians, Scholars and Lay Leaders began circulating a petition a few weeks ago urging all 271 active Bishops in the Catholic Church in the United States to step down. The Catholic Church is “criminally, morally reprehensible organisation. Due to degradation in moral, the Roman Catholic Church will disintegrate and every Catholic bears the brunt thereof. This medieval Cult faced with the prospect of almost certainly dying in a very short time. Continued cases of child rape in every country, and many other vile acts which are unethical and sinful to contemporary Christian societies, still take place. The congregation of people in every land have lost trust in Mother Church and God, itself, since neither can provide a cure or safety from the pestilence of sex scandals plaguing the rottenness that is the Roman Catholic Cult.
When a Priest is accused of sexual rape, his local Bishop who is also an offender is unlikely to punish the Priest and instead will certainly never inform the local police. The local police in most cases will never act, out of fear of the power of the very powerful Catholic Church. The local Bishop is now a willing enabler of the sexual crimes of his local Priest, harming not only the child, but all local children in his parish. The Priest will rape with impunity until he, the local Priest is moved to another parish, where he will start up again, destroying more children’s lives, continuing the cycle of rape, cover-ups and fear.
In the Catholic Church, “Sexual rape and corruption is conferred from the top down, from corrupt pedophile men in power. The Catholic Bishops who sexually abuse seminarians, and most did, establishing a genealogy of rape, setting up a pattern of institutional secrecy, similarly to the Mafia’s Omertà. But omertà literally means "manhood" and refers to the idea of a man dealing with his own criminal problems without the help of either the police or the lawful law. As we come to know the term, Omertà has also become synonymous with the Mafia's code of silence. The Catholic Church have cleverly used Omertà with great skill and success, continues to do so to this very day.
This code of Omertà, used by the Catholic Church allows the code of silence that places importance on complete silence in the face of questioning by authorities or outsiders; non-cooperation with authorities, the government, or outsiders; and wilfully ignoring and generally avoiding interference with the illegal activities of its Bishops and Priests, for example, not contacting law enforcement or the authorities when one is aware of, witness to, or even the victim of certain crimes. Especially crimes of rape against children, retaliation against informers, the innocent children, is common in Catholic Church circles, where the adult children, now known as mental misfits are subject to continued attacks on their character, their manhoods and their self esteem. A common used ploy of this criminal Cult, the Roman Catholic Church. The categorical prohibition of cooperation with any state authorities, like the Police or Government is an absolute no-no, and is enforced by the active enablers at the Vatican.
According to the Vatican, the Police and Government officials should absolutely avoid interfering in the business of the Catholic Church. The Vatican has decreed that its Clerics should never inform the lawful authorities of a crime under any circumstances. The Vatican enforces Omertà which is an extreme form of loyalty and solidarity in the face of any outside authority. One of the absolute tenets of the Roman Catholic Church is that it is deeply demeaning and shameful to betray the sins of the Roman Catholic Church to outside authorities.
The Mafia’s most famous proverb and by extension the Roman Catholic Church’s, is —-“Cu è surdu, orbu e taci, campa cent'anni ‘mpaci" - “He who is deaf, blind and silent will live a hundred years in peace". For that reason, many Catholic Church-related crimes go unreported, after all they are the original Mafia, with over 2,000 years of corrupt history to back them up. Judges, lawyers and politicians have a license to steal and lie, we the Catholic Church don’t need one, we have God, they scream. The Catholic Church turns its trained teenage boys in its seminaries into mindless, sloven minded men, as the newly qualified Priests quickly turn themselves into useful idiots and pedophiles. As Cardinal Pellophile wish he had said,— quoting a dead Mafia Boss-
“This life of ours, this is a wonderful life. If you can get through life like this and get away with it, hey, that’s great. But its very, very unpredictable. There’s so many ways you can screw it up, sex with children is one, just don’t ever get caught and never, ever tell”. --Owen Felix O’Neill
Cardinal Pell abused my son, Father testifies
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2018/03/15/cardinal-pell-abused-my-son-father-testifies
https://www.news24.com/World/News/father-testifies-in-australian-court-cardinal-abused-son-20180315
Father testifies in Australian court Cardinal abused Son
https://www.boston25news.com/news/father-testifies-in-australian-court-cardinal-abused-son/716198095
Father testifies in Australian court Cardinal abused Son
https://www.news.com.au/national/courts-law/it-was-the-smooth-pell-on-the-stand-father-of-abuse-victims/news-story/00af6c776ef52c35c964fba9b7f7db0f
‘It was the smooth Pell on the stand’: Father of abuse victims;-
THE father of two girls who were raped by a priest while in primary school said he’d given up hope that Cardinal Pell would fix the Church’s response to institutional paedophilia.
https://www.wral.com/australian-court-hears-public-testimony-in-cardinal-pell-abuse-case/17416908/
The second witness to testify was the father of an alleged victim who died of a suspected heroin overdose in 2014. He said he believed his son, who had been in a boys’ choir, developed a drug habit while in high school.F
A FEW Rotten Apples from a Barrel of Rotten Apples.
Popes & Cardinals Accused of covering up Sexual Rape by Clergy members or Raping Children
1. Pope Francis of Rome
2. Pope Benedict XVI of Rome
3. All past Popes.
1. Cardinal Bernard Francis Law of Boston
2. Cardinal Keith O’Brien of Scotland
3. Cardinal George Pell of Australia
4. Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of Washington
5. Cardinal, Francisco Javier Errázuriz Ossa of Chile
6. Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington
7. Cardinal Seán Baptist Brady of Ireland
8. Cardinal Joseph Tobin of New Jersey
9. Cardinal Daniel Nicholas DiNardo of Galveston-Houston
10. Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua of Philadelphia
11. Cardinal Gerhard Müller of Germany
12. Cardinal Philippe Barbarin of France
13. Cardinal Godfried Danneels of Belgium
14. Cardinal Desmond Connell of Ireland
15. Cardinal Sergio Obeso Rivera of Mexico
16. Cardinal Reinhard Marx of Germany
17. Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz of Poland
18. Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe of Italy
19. Cardinal Josef De Kesel of Belgium
20. Cardinal João Bráz de Aviz of Brazil
21. Cardinal Óscar Maradiaga of Honduras
22. Cardinal Kevin Joseph Farrell of U.S.A.
20 of 39 Dutch Cardinals, Bishops and auxiliaries 'covered up sexual abuse
21. Cardinal Vincent Nichols of England
22. Cardinal Blase Joseph Cupich of Chicago
23. Cardinal Justin Francis Rigali, of Philadelphia
24. Cardinal John Joseph Krol of Philadelphia
Popes & Cardinals Accused of covering up Sexual Rape by Clergy members or Raping Children
1. Pope Francis of Rome
2. Pope Benedict XVI of Rome
3. All past Popes.
1. Cardinal Bernard Francis Law of Boston
2. Cardinal Keith O’Brien of Scotland
3. Cardinal George Pell of Australia
4. Cardinal Theodore McCarrick of Washington
5. Cardinal, Francisco Javier Errázuriz Ossa of Chile
6. Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington
7. Cardinal Seán Baptist Brady of Ireland
8. Cardinal Joseph Tobin of New Jersey
9. Cardinal Daniel Nicholas DiNardo of Galveston-Houston
10. Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua of Philadelphia
11. Cardinal Gerhard Müller of Germany
12. Cardinal Philippe Barbarin of France
13. Cardinal Godfried Danneels of Belgium
14. Cardinal Desmond Connell of Ireland
15. Cardinal Sergio Obeso Rivera of Mexico
16. Cardinal Reinhard Marx of Germany
17. Cardinal Kazimierz Nycz of Poland
18. Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe of Italy
19. Cardinal Josef De Kesel of Belgium
20. Cardinal João Bráz de Aviz of Brazil
21. Cardinal Óscar Maradiaga of Honduras
22. Cardinal Kevin Joseph Farrell of U.S.A.
20 of 39 Dutch Cardinals, Bishops and auxiliaries 'covered up sexual abuse
21. Cardinal Vincent Nichols of England
22. Cardinal Blase Joseph Cupich of Chicago
23. Cardinal Justin Francis Rigali, of Philadelphia
24. Cardinal John Joseph Krol of Philadelphia